BOBST has brought into its boardroom a man from the world of one of the largest global users of packaging — Nestlé.
At first glance, the appointment of Eugenio Simioni to the Board of Directors of BOBST Group SA may look like a normal corporate governance move. But for corrugated board producers, it raises a much more interesting question: why would a packaging machinery group bring in a senior executive whose career was built inside one of the world’s largest food and beverage companies?



















Simioni is the former CEO of Nestlé Switzerland. He led Nestlé’s business at country level, including sales, brands, production, logistics, teams and market relationships. Before that, he built a long career inside Nestlé through audit, logistics, communications, marketing and sales, with international experience in Australia, South Korea and the Philippines.
The scale of this appointment is best understood through the numbers. In 2025, Nestlé reported sales of CHF 89.5 billion, while BOBST Group reported sales of CHF 1.622 billion. The difference is more than 55 times. In other words, a packaging machinery manufacturer is bringing into its boardroom a leader from a company whose business is many times larger — and whose operations depend every day on packaging performance, logistics, shelf impact and consumer trust.
This appointment also fits the way Jean-Pascal Bobst has already explained BOBST’s strategy. In an interview with Accenture’s The Industrialist, he described BOBST’s future around four pillars: connectivity, digitalization, automation and sustainability. More importantly, he used Nestlé and Coca-Cola as examples of major brand owners whose packaging decisions create complexity across the entire value chain — from packaging concept and design to pre-press, production, packing and distribution. In the same strategic context, he made one of the clearest statements about BOBST’s direction: “We are selling performance.”
That line matters. Nestlé does not appear in this story by accident. Jean-Pascal Bobst has already used Nestlé as an example of the kind of brand owner around which a complex packaging ecosystem is built. So the arrival of the former CEO of Nestlé Switzerland in the BOBST boardroom looks less like a simple governance detail — and more like a continuation of the same strategic logic: BOBST wants to speak to the market not only in the language of machines, but also in the language of performance, brands, logistics and business results.
Why Nestlé Matters Here
Nestlé is not just coffee, chocolate, water or baby food. It is a global system of brands, factories, supply chains, retailers and packaging standards. A company of this size does not evaluate packaging only as a technical item. It looks at whether packaging protects the product, survives logistics, supports shelf visibility, avoids claims, reduces waste and fits the economics of mass production.
That is the difference between the logic of a brand owner and the logic of a machine supplier. A machinery company may start with speed, formats, automation and technical capabilities. A global FMCG group starts with risk, repeatability, consumer experience, retail execution, cost per unit and total chain efficiency. If BOBST can bring more of that thinking into its strategic decisions, the result may not be a new machine tomorrow — but a sharper understanding of what customers actually need to justify investment.
Where This Could Become Practical
Simioni’s role is not to design die-cutters, folder-gluers or digital platforms. A board member does not rewrite a product roadmap alone. The more realistic question is whether his experience can strengthen how BOBST connects equipment, service, data and commercial outcomes.
This is where BOBST already has material to work with. BOBST Connect is built around data, workflow visibility and machine performance. oneECG focuses on color consistency and repeatability — a key issue for brand owners who expect the same packaging identity across different production sites and technologies. The updated EXPERTFOLD direction also fits this logic: preparation, production data and connected services become part of the value proposition, not just the mechanical specification.
For corrugated board producers, this matters because brand-owner pressure is becoming more precise. Large customers do not only ask whether a box can be produced. They ask whether it can be produced consistently, delivered reliably, printed accurately, packed efficiently, palletized correctly and repeated across orders without quality surprises.
From Selling Machines to Selling Business Outcomes
The strongest equipment suppliers are no longer competing only on speed or format range. They are competing on the ability to explain what changes in the customer’s business after the machine is installed.
For a corrugated plant, the real calculation is not only the purchase price. It is uptime, waste, changeover time, staffing, energy, service response, quality stability, pallet utilization, warehouse flow and the ability to serve more demanding customers.
A cheaper machine that creates bottlenecks, claims or unstable output can become expensive very quickly. A more expensive machine can be justified only if the business case is clear.
This is where Nestlé experience becomes relevant. A global food and beverage company evaluates suppliers through the lens of continuity, risk reduction, cost control and brand protection. If this mindset becomes stronger inside BOBST’s boardroom, it may push the company to present its solutions less as technical assets and more as measurable business systems.
Not only: “We sell machines.”
But: “We help build a more profitable packaging business.”
What This Means for Corrugated Board Producers
For large corrugated groups, this direction may be positive. They already have teams, capital and data infrastructure to benefit from connected machines, automation and performance-based service models. For them, a supplier that speaks the language of OEE, repeatability, sustainability and total cost of ownership is easier to integrate into a long-term industrial strategy.
For small and mid-sized producers, the question is more complicated. If BOBST’s future becomes more connected, automated and outcome-based, will the offer become more valuable — or simply more expensive and difficult to implement?
Will smaller plants be able to use the data, service tools and digital platforms properly? Will the return on investment be clear enough for companies that do not have large engineering and IT teams?
This is the real test. Business-outcome thinking is only useful if it reaches the factory floor, not just the boardroom presentation.
The Critical Point
This appointment should not be over-romanticized.
It does not mean BOBST will suddenly become a Nestlé-style company. It does not prove that its machines will change immediately. It does not guarantee lower costs, better service or easier access for smaller producers.
Formally, Simioni was elected to the Board of Directors of BOBST Group SA at the company’s Annual General Meeting on 2 April 2026. But the more important point is not the date. It is the strategic signal behind the appointment.
BOBST is bringing the voice of the global packaging customer closer to the table where its future is discussed.
corruga.expert Conclusion
For corrugated board producers, the message is not: “BOBST appointed a former Nestlé executive, therefore everything changes.”
The message is more practical: watch how BOBST translates this customer-side perspective into products, services, pricing, digital tools and support models.
If the company can make connected performance easier to understand, easier to calculate and easier to implement, this appointment may become more than a governance detail. It may support a stronger shift from selling equipment to selling productivity, stability, payback and growth.
But if the strategy remains too expensive or too complex for ordinary producers, the benefit will be limited mainly to large groups.
That is why this appointment matters. Not because it is a sensation by itself, but because it raises the right question for the market:
Will the next generation of corrugated equipment be judged by machine specifications — or by the business result it delivers?