BOBST is entering a more selective phase of the corrugated investment cycle with one of the industry’s strongest strategic advantages: a global installed base, a resilient service organisation and the ability to help converters improve the equipment they already own.

In the first half of 2026, Services & Performance generated CHF 328.1 million in sales — more than Printing & Converting. The division remained profitable with EBIT of CHF 34.7 million, demonstrating why BOBST is no longer simply a machinery manufacturer, but a long-term production partner built around service, original parts, upgrades, digital tools and performance improvement.
The market is changing, not disappearing. Customers are becoming more selective and are prioritising automation, waste reduction, uptime, shorter changeovers and projects with a clear return. This shift fits directly with BOBST’s strategy around service, remanufacturing, modernisation and better use of installed capacity.
The financial report nevertheless shows real pressure. Bobst Group reported first-half sales of CHF 589.9 million, down 11.6% year on year. EBIT moved from a CHF 5.4 million profit to a CHF 25 million loss, while the net result deteriorated to a CHF 32.5 million loss. Group order intake fell 11%; in Printing & Converting, orders were approximately 20% lower.
These figures should not be hidden, but they should be read in context. While demand for new machinery weakened, BOBST’s service business remained comparatively stable and generated more revenue than new equipment. The installed base is giving the Group a second engine at exactly the moment when converters are delaying large expansion projects.
For corrugated board producers, this is not simply a story about weaker demand. It is a practical guide to the next investment cycle — one in which profitability, productivity and total cost of ownership will matter more than capacity alone.
Why this matters to a corrugated plant director
BOBST’s results raise several immediate questions for owners, plant directors and technical managers:
- Is this the right moment to order a new machine?
- Is a retrofit financially safer than additional capacity?
- Can automation replace labour without creating underused capacity?
- Should the priority be speed, uptime, waste reduction or changeover performance?
- How quickly must a project pay back in a market where demand remains uncertain?
BOBST operates across corrugated board, folding carton, labels and flexible packaging. Its equipment covers printing, die-cutting, folding, gluing, inspection, automation and digital production management. That makes its order intake a useful barometer of investment confidence across the packaging industry.
When machinery orders slow, it usually means customers are protecting cash, using existing capacity more intensively and delaying large strategic projects. That is exactly what BOBST says is happening — but it is also why service, upgrades and performance improvement are becoming more important.
The money: three years that changed the cycle
The deterioration is not the result of one weak quarter.
First-half sales reached CHF 828.2 million in 2024. They then fell to CHF 667.4 million in 2025 and CHF 589.9 million in 2026.
From the first-half peak in 2024, BOBST has lost CHF 238.3 million of revenue — a decline of almost 29% in two years.
The change inside Printing & Converting is even more severe:
H1 2024: CHF 497.2 million
H1 2025: CHF 332.4 million
H1 2026: CHF 261.8 million
That means machinery sales in the division have fallen by almost 47% from the 2024 first-half level.
The division’s operating result tells the same story. Printing & Converting recorded a CHF 58.9 million loss in H1 2026, compared with a CHF 42.4 million loss a year earlier. Lower fixed costs could not compensate for the fall in volume.
For the full year 2025, Group sales had already declined 14.2% to CHF 1.622 billion. EBIT almost halved to CHF 72.7 million, and net profit fell to CHF 36.6 million.
The first half of 2026 therefore marks a deeper phase of the correction, not its beginning.

From post-COVID boom to a CAPEX freeze
The cycle can be read in five stages.
2019–2020: uncertainty and disrupted investment during the pandemic.
2021–2022: a rapid packaging rebound, labour shortages and a rush toward automation.
2023–2024: strong machinery deliveries and unusually large order backlogs.
2025: machinery sales fell sharply as converters absorbed the capacity already installed.
H1 2026: investment decisions became even slower, especially in corrugated board.
Only a few years ago, converters were focused on securing production slots and managing long delivery schedules. Today, the problem has reversed. Equipment can be offered, but boards of directors are demanding a much stronger business case before approving it.
BOBST says customers are concentrating on cash preservation, capacity utilisation, operational efficiency and productivity improvement rather than expansion. Projects with a clear and rapid return still move ahead; larger strategic investments are frequently postponed.
This is the end of the easy capacity cycle.
Corrugated has become the weakest market
BOBST reports that all four of its packaging industries remain below the previous year, but the pressure is uneven.
Flexible packaging is the most resilient. Labels vary by region. Folding carton remains difficult.
Corrugated board is the most affected by weak demand, margin pressure and industrial overcapacity.
BOBST cites estimated overcapacity of more than 30% in the European paper and board industry. It also notes that European board prices have risen by more than 20% since the escalation of regional conflicts.
For a converter, that is a difficult combination:
- demand remains soft;
- installed capacity is underused;
- price competition is intense;
- board and operating costs pressure margins;
- customers resist price increases;
- large CAPEX projects become harder to justify.
The company refers to industry expectations that another 12–18 months may be needed before supply and demand return to a healthier balance.
The warning is not that corrugated packaging has lost its long-term value. It is that many plants currently own more capacity than the market is ready to pay for.
A broader industry signal
The weakness in machinery investment is consistent with what large paper and packaging groups are reporting.
Stora Enso’s Q2 2026 sales were almost flat, while its CEO Hans Sohlström said that “market conditions nevertheless remained challenging.” The company continued optimising its portfolio and divested its German corrugated board production units.
This is an important distinction. Packaging demand has not disappeared, and some producers are improving operational earnings. But capital is being allocated more selectively, weaker assets are being sold or closed, and new investments must compete against restructuring, debt reduction and productivity programmes.
In that environment, a machinery order is no longer approved because the market “will probably grow.” It must demonstrate exactly where the savings and additional margin will come from.
What about BHS, Fosber and other competitors?
A precise like-for-like H1 comparison is not publicly available.
BHS Corrugated and Fosber do not publish segment-level half-year financial statements comparable with BOBST’s listed-company disclosures. Koenig & Bauer reports consolidated financial results, but its disclosures do not isolate a directly comparable global corrugated-machinery order figure. The same limitation applies to many Chinese suppliers.
The competitive field nevertheless matters. BOBST is facing established European and international names such as BHS Corrugated, Fosber, BW Papersystems and Koenig & Bauer Celmacch, while Chinese manufacturers continue improving automation, print quality, delivery times and international service.
For buyers, the comparison is no longer simply “Swiss or European quality versus a lower Chinese price.”
The correct comparison is total cost per saleable box over the full life of the machine:
- purchase price;
- labour requirement;
- waste;
- uptime;
- energy;
- changeover time;
- service response;
- spare-parts availability;
- digital integration;
- upgrade potential;
- residual value.
BOBST cannot defend a premium position through reputation alone. It must prove that the higher initial investment produces lower risk and stronger lifetime economics.
That is the premium model’s biggest stress test in years.
The paradox: service is now bigger than machinery
Services & Performance generated CHF 328.1 million in first-half sales, only 2.1% below the previous year. Printing & Converting generated CHF 261.8 million.
In other words, service represented about 56% of Group sales in H1 2026.
The service division remained profitable with EBIT of CHF 34.7 million, while the machinery division lost CHF 58.9 million.
This is not a side story. It reveals how BOBST’s business model is changing under pressure.
The company continues to earn revenue after installation through field service, original parts, maintenance, retrofits, upgrades, operator support, production optimisation and digital tools.
Its installed base has effectively become a second business — and in the current cycle, the larger one.
How strong is the management response?
The first-half numbers are too weak to describe the response as a success. The Group is loss-making, machinery volumes continue falling and fixed-cost reductions have only partly offset the decline.
However, three elements show that management is not relying only on a market rebound.
First, BOBST is reducing fixed costs in Printing & Converting.
Second, it is protecting the recurring service business, where proximity, parts availability and field response create a competitive advantage.
Third, it is concentrating the customer proposition on projects with measurable returns: automation, waste reduction, uptime, digitalisation and productivity.
At Corrugated 2026, BOBST product marketing director Christian Vionnet framed one session around a blunt question: “Could the eCommerce bubble burst?” The title itself reflects how openly the company is now discussing overcapacity and the need to turn it into opportunity.
The strategic direction is sensible. The financial test is whether service growth and cost control can support the Group until machinery investment returns.
Better Than New: why old machines become more valuable in a downturn
When customers hesitate to purchase new capacity, retrofits and remanufacturing become more attractive.
Many older BOBST machines have mechanical platforms that can support new drives, controls, safety systems and digital functions. Instead of replacing the complete asset, a converter can modernise the parts that limit performance.
The potential advantages are practical:
- lower investment than a completely new machine;
- faster implementation;
- reduced training disruption;
- improved safety;
- higher uptime;
- better changeover performance;
- longer productive life;
- potentially stronger resale value.
“Better Than New” should not be read as a promise that every rebuilt machine outperforms every new one. Its real value is economic: a structurally sound asset may deliver a better return after targeted modernisation than a new line purchased only to add capacity.

For BOBST, this is also strategically important. Every modernised machine strengthens the service relationship and extends the revenue life of the installed base.he decision for a typical 80–150 million m² corrugated plant
For a medium or large European converter, the central question is not whether a new BOBST machine is technologically impressive.
It is whether the plant has enough profitable work to justify it.
A new line is easier to defend when it removes a proven bottleneck, replaces several labour-intensive processes, cuts waste materially or wins work that the current equipment cannot produce.
A retrofit may be the better decision when the plant already has underused mechanical capacity but suffers from obsolete controls, long changeovers, safety limitations, poor data visibility or unreliable components.
The wrong decision is to buy speed that the sales department cannot fill.
Seven questions before approving CAPEX in 2026–2027
- What percentage of current capacity is genuinely utilised on profitable work?
- Is the project adding volume, or replacing labour, waste and downtime?
- What is the payback under a conservative demand scenario, not the sales forecast’s best case?
- Can a retrofit solve 70–80% of the problem for substantially less capital?
- How much production will be lost during installation, ramp-up and training?
- What will service, parts, energy and staffing cost over ten years?
- What residual value and upgrade path will remain if the market changes again?
A supplier that cannot answer these questions is selling equipment. A supplier that can answer them is participating in the customer’s production strategy.
What happens next?
BOBST’s backlog at the end of June 2026 was 13% below the previous year, but 11% higher than at the end of 2025.
That is the first small sign that postponed demand has not disappeared.
There are two possible readings.
The optimistic case is that projects are accumulating and could return quickly when geopolitical uncertainty, trade policy and customer confidence improve.
The cautious case is that the industry still carries too much capacity, so converters will continue prioritising service, retrofits and operational improvements over major new lines.
BOBST expects a stronger second half, but now forecasts full-year 2026 sales and results below 2025.
The recovery, when it comes, will not resemble the last boom. It will be driven by labour savings, lower waste, shorter changeovers, higher uptime and digital control — not by capacity for its own sake.
The corruga.expert verdict
BOBST’s H1 2026 report contains three numbers every corrugated executive should remember:
CHF 32.5 million net loss.
Approximately 20% lower Printing & Converting orders.
CHF 328.1 million of service sales — more than new machinery.
Together, they describe a fundamental shift.
The machinery boom has ended. Corrugated is the most pressured market. Yet BOBST’s installed base is giving the company a powerful second engine through service, upgrades and remanufacturing.
For converters, this is not a signal to stop investing.
It is a signal to stop buying capacity without proof.
The best machine in 2026–2027 will not necessarily be the newest, fastest or cheapest. It will be the one — new or modernised — that produces the clearest, fastest and most defensible return.
Key figures
H1 2026
Sales: CHF 589.9 million, –11.6%
EBIT: CHF –25.0 million
Net result: CHF –32.5 million
Group order intake: –11%
Printing & Converting sales: CHF 261.8 million, –21.2%
Printing & Converting order intake: approximately –20%
Services & Performance sales: CHF 328.1 million, –2.1%
Backlog: –13% year on year; +11% versus year-end 2025
FY 2025
Sales: CHF 1.622 billion, –14.2%
EBIT: CHF 72.7 million
Net result: CHF 36.6 million
Printing & Converting sales: CHF 938.6 million, –23.1%
Services & Performance sales: CHF 683.7 million, +2.0%
Sources
BOBST, Half-year results 2026 and Half-year Report 2026, published 28 July 2026.
BOBST, 2025 full-year results, published 27 February 2026.
BOBST, Corrugated 2026 industry materials, April–July 2026.
Stora Enso, Half-year Report Q2 2026, published 23 July 2026.
Brunton Business Publications Ltd, industry commentary supplied by corruga.expert.
Sources last checked: 3 August 2026.
corruga.expert

















