Wednesday, June 17, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
corruga.expert
  • All News
  • News Europe
  • News North America
  • Corruga Empire
  • Contacts
  • Advertising
No Result
View All Result
corruga.expert
  • All News
  • News Europe
  • News North America
  • Corruga Empire
  • Contacts
  • Advertising
No Result
View All Result
corruga.expert
No Result
View All Result

World in Recycling. How Party Started

30.09.2022
in All News, Main, News Europe, News North America, Recycling, Useful
A A
3
SHARES
346
VIEWS

Leer en español
Читать на русском

We hear a lot about recycling these days, but thе concept is not new, in fact, it is almost 1,000 years old. The first mention of the collection and processing of waste paper refers to Japan, 1031. It is our pleasure to introduce you some milestones in the history of recycling

1031 – during the decline of the Japanese Imperial court in the Heian Period, paper production moved away from the state’s control as workers gradually merged into common society. As a result, private estate owners built paper mills and hired those workers to continue making paper.

It wasn’t long until the process of reusing waste paper became common, in order to conserve materials and maximise output. A very early form of the curbside collection involved cart men going from house to house collecting refuse.

1690 – opening of The Rittenhouse Mill, Philadelphia. America’s first paper mill – built by German-born Wilhelm Rittenhausen – took old fabrics, cloths, cotton and linen to produce recycled paper that would be used for printing and publication. The mill operated until the mid 1800s, and was the Rittenhouse family industry for the better part of a century.

1890 – The British Paper Company was established to make paper and cardboard from recycled materials. The materials were collected by cart men and organizations like the Salvation Army.

1897 – New York City Material Recovery Centre opens. Following a recycling decree for New York City residents two years prior, NYC’s first materials recovery facility was created. This allowed discarded materials to be sorted and separated into various categories, so recyclable materials such as metals, paper, burlap, and even horsehair could be recovered and reused.

1914 to 1945 – during the first and second World Wars recycling was an essential part of maintaining the war effort. Both the US and Great Britain appealed to the public for help. Recycling propaganda pushes (Salvage for Victory in the US, 1942) asked people to think more about what they threw away. For example, people were instructed to take waste cooking fats to local meat dealers, so they could be recycled into fuel for explosives.

During the war times, reuse and recycling of tin, rubber, steel, paper etc. were also a means for many people to make a living by selling reclaimed items or materials.

1960’s – the first curbside program was established in the US to collect yard waste, metals, and paper. By 1992 the number of curbside programs in the country had jumped to nearly 5,000.

1970 – The Recycling Mobius Loop Logo. The Container Corporation of America held a competition to find a new symbol for recycled paper. 23 year-old engineering student Gary Anderson entered with a simple logo based on arrows arcing around each other. He won, earning $2,000, and the iconic logo has become ingrained into the public consciousness ever since.

1972 – a single national law on waste management was created in Western Germany.

1976 – in the US the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) governing the disposal of solid and hazardous waste was signed. The law addressed the increasing problems the nation faced from the growing waste issues.

1983 – The Blue Box Recycling System in Canada. In the city of Kitchener, Ontario, the system was introduced as a way of efficiently sorting and collecting household waste.

The blue box system made it simple for the public to recycle plastic, paper, glass, aluminium, steel and other materials. The system was adopted and modified across the globe, and it remains in use to this day.

1987 – New Jersey enacts the nation’s first universal mandatory recycling law, which requires all residents to separate recyclables from their trash.

2015 – the UN General Assembly sets up 17 interlinked sustainable development goals (169 targets) designed to be a shared blueprint for peace and prosperity for people and the planet, now and into the future. The goals were adopted by 193 countries as part of the 2030 Development Agenda titled Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and intended to be achieved between 2020 and 2030.

The 12th SDG (Responsible consumption and production), ensuring the transition to sustainable consumption and production patterns, has formed the basis for many legislative changes aimed at the responsible use of the environment and natural resources all over the world.

gofro.expert

If you find an error, please highlight a piece of text and clickCtrl+Enter.

Tags: Gary AndersonThe Blue Box Recycling SystemThe British Paper CompanyThe Rittenhouse Mill

Related Posts

No Content Available
Next Post
Shanying Paper заказывает у Voith ещё две БДМ

Shanying Paper Commissions Two More Voith XcelLines

VPK Group запускает производство фэнфолда

VPK Group запускает производство фэнфолда

VPK Group запускает производство фэнфолда

VPK Group Launching Fanfold Production


Error, no Advert ID set! Check your syntax!

Popular

Klabin Q1 2026: Where the Money Is in Corrugated Board

Klabin Q1 2026: Where the Money Is in Corrugated Board

19.05.2026

Interview

Machinery Assist: “Most Companies Don’t Lose Money When They Buy a Used Machine. They Lose It When They Try to Move It.”

Machinery Assist: “Most Companies Don’t Lose Money When They Buy a Used Machine. They Lose It When They Try to Move It.”

11.05.2026

corruga.expert is an online project by Igor Tkalenko featuring everything useful for corrugated board manufactures and processors. News, analytics, technology, video reports from exhibitions and events - everything you need to know about corrugated board in one place. If you have any good news you would like to share or need help promoting your business, go to the professionals. Go to corruga.expert.

DS Smith Launceston Closure: The Fourth Wave Reaches the Factory Floor

DS Smith Launceston Closure: The Fourth Wave Reaches the Factory Floor

06.05.2026

Delays appeared. Questions multiplied. Trucks waited. Installation teams stood idle. Production schedules slipped. And every extra day cost money. Over many years of work and experience, we understand a simple truth: machinery relocation should not be a drama. What changed — and why it matters During these years, MachineryAssist has handled nearly 5,000 truckloads of industrial equipment. Dozens of corrugators, FFGs, RDCs, and many other types of oversized, specialized machinery. Every project taught us something new. Every challenge forced us to improve. Today, we complete many projects in nearly half the time that was considered normal a decade ago. For a manufacturer running a corrugator at full capacity, every month of downtime can represent $300,000–$600,000 in lost production. Getting back online two weeks faster is not a logistics detail. It is a financial decision. The case that changed how we think about equipment A few years ago, we relocated a BOBST die-cutter from a plant in Austria to a facility in Belgium. Standard job, on paper. The machine weighed in sections that exceeded what our equipment at the time could lift in a single pick. We had to break it down further than necessary — adding two full days of dismantling, complicating the reassembly sequence, and extending the commissioning phase. Projects like these pushed us to invest in portable high-capacity lifting equipment rated to 20 tonnes — four times the 5-tonne standard units. The difference in practice: large machine sections and complete sub-assemblies that previously required full disassembly can now be moved intact. On every comparable relocation since, we have recovered 10 to 15 working days per project. At a daily downtime cost of $15,000–$20,000 for a mid-sized corrugated plant, that is a difference of $150,000 to $300,000 — per project. The problems nobody warns you about Heavy machinery relocation is not just a logistics challenge. It is a minefield of invisible risks that hit from every direction — and usually hit hard. Licensing. In several European countries, crane operators require local certification to work legally on-site. We have seen projects where a contractor arrived with a qualified crew — only to discover that their licences were not recognised in that jurisdiction. The result: work stopped, a certified local operator had to be sourced on short notice, and the customer paid three days of idle time across an eight-person installation team. Cost: roughly $40,000 in delays and emergency sourcing fees. This is entirely avoidable — if you know to check. Opportunistic upgrades. A disassembled machine looks like an opportunity. Owners think: while it is in pieces, let us replace the worn parts, upgrade the drive system, add the sensors we always wanted. Sometimes that logic is sound. Very often it is not. We have seen upgrade decisions made mid-relocation that extended the project by four to six weeks, because the replacement components were not in stock, the modified machine required re-engineering of the installation footprint, or the new systems simply were not compatible with the existing line. The cost of one poorly timed upgrade can exceed the entire relocation budget. The rule we follow: if an upgrade was not planned, budgeted, and sourced before the machine left its original location — it does not happen during transit. What experience actually means There is a saying that moving is like experiencing two fires. We have spent the last decade learning how to make it feel like something far calmer — a well-planned journey with known checkpoints, documented risks, and people who have seen almost every failure mode before it happens. Experience is not only knowing how to do something. Experience is knowing what will go wrong before it does — and having already solved it. If you are planning a machinery relocation, we are happy to walk through your specific project: the equipment, the route, the timeline, the risks. No obligation. Because the best relocation is the one nobody remembers as a problem. MachineryAssist specialises in the relocation of heavy industrial and corrugated packaging equipment across Europe and beyond.

It Took Us Ten Years to Learn That Machinery Relocation Should Not Be a Drama

16.03.2026

Subscribe to corruga.expert

Contact Us
International Paper Buys NORPAC for $360M: Why Independent Corrugated Board Producers Should Pay Attention

International Paper Buys NORPAC for $360M: Why Independent Corrugated Board Producers Should Pay Attention

11.06.2026

No Content Available

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Login

Register | Lost your password?

Register

Captcha loading...


A password will be e-mailed to you.

Log in | Lost your password?

Reset Password

Log in| Register

No Result
View All Result
  • Русский
  • Español
  • Українська
  • All News
  • News Europe
  • News North America
  • Corruga Empire
  • Contacts
  • Advertising
  • Login
  • Sign Up

Spelling error report

The following text will be sent to our editors:

Send Cancel